Shell sets an impressive scenario as he gave him a vision for the long-term future this week. Over the next five years, the UK energy major will buy back 40% of its stock.
To raise that valuation to the level of US rivals ExxonMobil and Chevron, the company is already spending more on shareholders than its future growth. Last year, it allocated $23 billion in dividends and buybacks and $21 billion in capital expenditures.
The pivot from growth to value is far from the epic, but Shell has abandoned plans that he has to diversify from oil and gas to become a top player in electricity and be at the forefront of the world’s shift to clean energy.
Currently, the company plans to further balance, offering to revert half of its operating cash flow back to shareholders. Sinead Gorman, Shell’s chief financial officer, told New York Stock Exchange audiences on Tuesday that he heard what investors wanted.
Investors have paid Shell. Since Wael Sawan became CEO in early 2023, the company’s shares have grown by more than 20%.
However, as oil fields in the Gulf of Mexico and Brazil begin to fade, there are questions about where Shell’s long-term growth will come from and how it will be located for the next five years.
Some content could not be loaded. Please check your internet connection or browser settings.
When asked if Shell was at risk of self-regulation if she kept canceling so many shares, Sawan simply said he was pleased with much fewer investors who share the company’s future “glory.” “They will be much richer than they are today.”
He slimmed the company, focused on oil and gas, reduced spending on clean energy, and promised consistency. He went through the company’s bureaucracy and seized control of all major spending decisions from its powerful divisional heads.
“We need to make it seem ruthless throughout the business and make sure that capital is allocated to opportunities in the running room most,” he explained to the Financial Times. “This is best done around the CEO and CFO table.”
As a result of the new discipline, Shell has now repurchased more than $3 billion in shares per quarter for the 13th consecutive quarter. This week, Sawan argued that even if the current levels begin to decline from around $70 per barrel, this consistency can be maintained at a higher distribution rate.
But despite all his efforts, investors looking at the oil and gas sector still prefer American companies. Shell’s market value is five times the debt-adjusted cash flow, while ExxonMobil is 9.2 times and Chevron is 9.6 times.
The issue is not specific to the shell, but applies to all European energy companies. Despite having consistently generated free cash flow per share over the past five years than its US counterparts, investors do not trust them to spend their money wisely.
Some content could not be loaded. Please check your internet connection or browser settings.
The valuation discount explanation includes the fear of companies burning cash on failed clean energy projects, lack of access to high margin US oil fields, and generally low flow of money into the European market.
Furthermore, US companies are returning even more cash to shareholders than Shell. Last year, Exxon spent 65% of its operating cash flow on buybacks and dividends.
Exxon can return more money because it has lower oil prices that are broken than shells. Exxon aims to reach the minimum revenue (minimum revenue) required to cover spending by 2030, compared to Shell’s $35 barrel, according to the company.
Asked if a similar level of shareholder distribution to Exxon could be reached, Sawan said he “is not considering dialing part of the financial framework,” and said he wanted to balance shareholder returns and maintain a “untouched balance sheet.”
Instead, Sawan is trying to answer two important questions from investors. Shell is changing things that are different from its American rivals.
“The longevity question was a big question,” he told analysts Tuesday. “If you leave your room today, you have a vision for not only 2028 but 2040. We’re playing this game in the long run.
His answer to distinguish Shell from its oil-heavy US rival is that the company considers gas to be a better, long-term bet. Shell predicts that gas demand will increase by 60% by 2040. This is because the fast-growing Asian economy is beginning to increase consumption.
Already the world’s largest trader in liquefied natural gas, Shell said it would increase sales of 4-5% per year. “We have a real competitive advantage that makes it very difficult for everyone to replicate.”
Another difference between us and our fellow Americans is the Shell trading business. This is a business that the company traditionally placed under tight wraps. Sawan revealed this week that his traders have not lost money in a quarter in the last decade, and that he could deliver an average return on capital of 2% at that point, contributing to a return of 4% in the future.
Martijn Rats, an analyst at Morgan Stanley, said behind the envelope calculations, the numbers suggest that they represent “more than a quarter, less than a third, less than a third” of future revenues, making it “one of the very big businesses in all shells.”
Sawan also said that despite cutting capital expenditures to pay for more buybacks, Shell could bring in $35 in the middle of $35 a barrel in the next five years, a day of new oil and gas online.
And he promised even more consistency. “You’ll see us working behind the scenes of us to make sure we’ve told you what we’ve said we’ll do. We want this to be an exciting story for you.”
Recommended
However, while analysts were positive about their strategy, few thought that Shell would completely close the gap with its US rivals.
“I don’t think shells should trade along exons. Essentially, exons have proven to be a better capital vessel for the long term,” said Biraj Borkhataria of RBC Capital Markets. “Under Wael Sawan, the discount has shifted from 45% to 35%. Will that discount be 20%? I think so.”
The prospect of moving the list to New York was no longer a “live discussion” option Sawan said he was on the table a year ago to promote the review.
“The stock will clearly be revalued,” added Eileen Himona, director of European oil and gas at Bernstein. “But it’s not overnight.”
