This article is the on-site version of the European Express Newsletter. Premium subscribers can sign up here to deliver their newsletters on weekdays and Saturday mornings. Standard subscribers can upgrade to premium here or explore all FT newsletters
good morning. News: Start: Europe’s biggest military force is planning to assume greater responsibility for the continent’s defense from the US, officials said in the financial era, including pitches to the Trump administration for the next five to ten years, in order to avoid the chaos of a rapid, unilateral withdrawal from NATO.
Today we report calls from many EU countries to the bloc, raising the highest humanitarian spending of the United Nations. The UN humanitarians have told Laura that cutting back on aid to purchase weapons instead is a self-destructive strategy.
In red
EU leaders yesterday promoted additional ideas two weeks later after using national budgets to boost defense spending of up to 800 million euros.
Context: On March 6, EU leaders approved a proposal to borrow 150 billion euros for unprecedented budgets, allowing member states to purchase arms. Additionally, they could violate the block’s strict deficit rules.
However, many countries are now being seized rather than a particularly painful option. It repeats the Covid-era Joint Debt Program. Countries of more countries, such as Italy and Spain, were able to rely on rich Dutch and German taxpayers to pay some of their money back.
Greek Prime Minister Kiliakos Mitotakis fired his first shot. “Maybe we should be more ambitious,” he said he would arrive at the Brussels leaders’ summit. He sought “co-borrowed facilities that provide grants to member states.”
“We have to make general borrowings again,” French President Emmanuel Macron said after the meeting. He also cited the need to spend more of his previous funding and pay back, but he admitted that there is still no “consensus.”
The traditionally frug-loving Netherlands “we’re against the Eurobond,” Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schuf said. “The Netherlands have restrictions and those are very logical restrictions.”
However, the old alliance of frugal, which generally strengthens Dutch opposition to general debt, is weakened. Sweden opposed the move, but Denmark is accepting European joint projects and money when necessary, the diplomat said.
Germany still supports the Dutch position, but things could change under the next government in Berlin, one EU official said.
Meanwhile, all large European political parties also approved joint debt. The European People’s Party said defence spending could come “through joint debt certificates if necessary.”
The European Socialist Party called for “European financial instruments to enhance security and defense investment and capabilities through general European debt.”
Liberal updates, including French President Emmanuel Macron, issued their own requests.
Green and radical European conservatives and reformists, including Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, are also in favour.
Today’s Chart: Green Retreat
Global companies have begun to lower their climate targets from executive pay plans as the corporate world retreats from the ESG initiative in the face of intense US opposition and increasing costs.
Self-destruction
UN humanitarian officials have warned of Europe’s long-term destabilizing effects of reducing global humanitarian assistance in re-registration, Laura Dubois wrote.
Context: After US President Donald Trump cuts international aid funds significantly, the UN has deep problems, with the UN relying on more than 20% of its budget.
However, European countries are also increasingly signaling to spend less on international crises and instead focus on themselves again again.
Tom Fletcher, governor of the UN Humanitarian Bureau, said that European countries are “very clear about their true trade-offs,” indicating that Sweden and the UK cuts and France and Germany could cut funds as well.
“The cuts in Europe are acknowledged by Europeans that there is a war on the continent from Europeans and they feel that there is a need to make more defenses,” Fletcher said.
He acknowledged that unlike the US, Europe is making “reluctant reductions” rather than “making sacrifices and rejoices.”
However, he warned that reducing aid would destabilize already fragile areas and ultimately make Europe less secure. “Foreign aid makes you safer. It has long-term dividends.”
“Aidance reduces long-term migration and reduces risks such as future economic crisis, pandemics and more,” Fletcher said. He said it was a “significant moment” to raise funds in Syria as the country rebuilt after years of civil war and immigration.
Ultimately, he said aid is “your first line of defense against these massive global challenges, and it is inevitable only by fences and walls.”
What to see today
German parliamentary senators vote for its debt defense package.
Please read these
Recommended newsletter
Free Lunch – A guide to discussions on world economic policy. Sign up here
British Nation – Peter Foster’s guide to the UK’s economy, trade and investment into a changing world. Sign up here
Are you enjoying the European Express? Sign up here to deliver directly to your inbox every day at 7am CET and Saturday noon CET. Tell us what you think, we love to hear from you: europe.express@ft.com. Keep up with the latest European stories @FTEurope
