good morning. How will the government get out of holes dug through welfare cuts? There are three possible ways to do this. Here it is ranked from the best option to the worst option (political speaking).
Workers can go to the old old tricks that a government under pressure often reaches. This is to make big eye-catching concessions on the morning of the vote. This is the best option, but it may not work at this stage given that the government’s attempts to bring the rebels back into the queue are undermining trust and plaguing the MP.
It might seek another old government trick that has lost hope of passing something: it just draws the vote, not defeated. This is the safest lever, which is why the problematic government gets to it.
Or it could force conflict, which could unleash all sorts of chaos. Currently, this is an option with Downing Street set up, and Keir Starmer confirmed yesterday that the vote will move forward despite more than 120 lawmakers supporting an amendment aimed at blocking the bill. But it is not the first time that the government of the day has reached the edge of the deep by, looked down and decided that discretion is a better part of courage.
Feeling Good Guide in Government is a denunciation game about exactly who is in charge of the confusion on Downing Street. Some thoughts about the following:
It was a long way from there to reach Kiel.
Who blames workers for the massive failure in welfare spending? Today’s Times brings out many of the finger points openly. The fault of Chief Whip Alan Campbell and failing to maintain responsibility for the Prime Minister’s Political Bureau Chief Claire Reynolds is because the rebellion cannot be predicted or restricted.
However, the name that lawmakers are cited more than anyone else is Morgan McSweeney, the prime minister’s chief of staff and most important aide. Jim Picard, George Parker and Anna Gross performed the inner cleavage of Congress Labour and the way “Morgan McSweeney, good or bad” became their proxy with this fantastic profile.
Who is responsible? I think the real answer is “none of the above.” The job of Chief Whip and the Political Director is not to “have the supernatural powers of mind control.”
If a legal policy case cannot withstand scrutiny, no one can persuade lawmakers to vote for the government. As one minister said, when the Treasury sought a visible number of spending cuts that do not actually fit the stated logic of government welfare reform. The amount of BABBLE on the importance of “reform” can make lawmakers forget about it and accept that changes to individual independent payments are an integral part of what the government wants to achieve.
Recommended
How about McSweeney? The most frequent criticism I have heard from Labour lawmakers is, as one of them said, he is “persuasion during peacetime wartime.” In other words, he is an election strategist in the role of Chief of Staff to the Government, and is a far-reaching approach to the next election. As another lawmaker said, “Downing Street continues to say that their number one priority is reelection, but we are losing.”
I don’t think the government’s focus on the next election will be particularly useful at this stage. It reflects not the fact that McSweeney won his position by winning the election, but the fact that Kiel Starmer has acquired a very conscious absence of an ideological or policy project. Without that maneuvering from the Prime Minister, the government would inevitably have to be run by something, which would always be “re-elected.”
All of these are accompanied by this government’s original crime. This was a promise that was made in 2024 when priorities were made by Boris Johnson in 2019, and would not soften with essentially the same phase. Conversely, workers often seemed to speak and act as if the only reason the Johnson government failed was an inadequate work ethic. But “to end the Louche culture that has worked so hard and developed around the place” makes it easier for Rishi Snack to keep these irreconciliatory promises and not aid in labor. So each fiscal event will instead become a painful trial, which is the fundamental reason why Labour lawmakers are increasingly hurt and worried.
Try this now
Mission Impossible: I saw the final calculations last night. That’s a bit of a disappointment. It was a lot of fun for a long time. This final entry is visible and a bit confusing, with plenty of wit and charm methods, cursed with pointless nods in the past. (I don’t know if within the imaginary audience of these films they want a trivial link between the minor characters and the first film, or a complicated link between the villains of this film, between the third event, but that’s certainly not me.)
Here’s a review of Danny Lee.
Today’s top stories
Get caught up in the work | Some major government laws, including overhauling Labour’s flagship employment rights, will not become law after being caught up in an incredibly late parliamentary process, at least until the fall.
Shoring Up Services | Keir Starmer launches a new trade strategy focused on boosting the export of UK services and strengthens its defense prevention prevention to protect the UK from fallout from Donald Trump’s global tariff war.
Talk of reforms in “Man in the Combat Era” | Despite having half the national average rate of asylum seekers living in the area, British hard-hit anti-Aziram rhetoric hit a chord in the former mining community in Durham County. Councillor Darren Grimes, the new Associate Deputy Leader of the Durham County Council, tells the story of a “combat-age man” moving into the area, including next to a single mother who “worried about her child.”
Concessions, Get Your Concessions | Number 10 is preparing to offer concessions to Labour to take charge of MPS, including changes to the points required for PIP eligibility, the Guardian reports. MPS also wants to see changes made to other proposals that affect the universal credit health top-up applied to those who cannot work. I hear Telegraph (Paywalled) is pondering as a potential amendment to the current bill, number 10, including its promise to speed up payments of funds to help people get back to work. Another option is to provide a guarantee that a review of policies in this area will soon be published.
Recommended newsletter
Last week – Start every week with a preview of what’s on the agenda. Sign up here
Newswrap – A summary of our business and economics. Sign up here
