Large tech companies are confident in their efforts to challenge EU regulations. I believe new support from the Trump administration will allow them to fight as hostile rules regarding artificial intelligence and market control.
Facebook owner Meta led a charge this year against the EU’s AI law, according to people familiar with its strategy.
Silicon Valley also wants to curb market abuse by major online platforms and limit the enforcement of digital market laws, which could potentially impose large financial fines on businesses, according to those familiar with the issue. We are promoting Brussels.
Their cause is being supported by the new administration. Vice President JD Vance has used his recent trip to Europe to defy EU laws on technology by denounceing the bloc’s “snazzy international” rules. He also called for AI regulations that “do not strangle” the rapidly evolving sector.
Lobbyists from other major tech companies have been drawing up new political reality in Washington before Donald Trump’s inauguration, including Google Chief Sundahl Pichai, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Apple Chief Tim Cook. He pointed out a line of high-tech executives in the center.
EU high-tech chief Henna Wilkunen told the Financial Times that despite US pressure, Europe is “fully committed to enforcing our rules.”
But earlier this month, the European Commission announced a planned AI liability directive designed to pay for any harm caused by AI tools or systems as part of a broader push for deregulation from Brussels. has been retracted.
Virkkunen said the decision was taken to encourage investment in AI due to pressure from US tech companies.
Some European industry officials and lawmakers say that limiting actions against major high-tech companies could be a tip for negotiations in transatlantic negotiations on trade and Washington’s commitment to European security. I interpreted it as a sign that there is.
The most immediate battle will focus on the expected standards of AI practice in April, and how companies deal with “systematic” risks in artificial intelligence, including how companies deal with the groundbreaking AI laws Here we will outline how the rules can be implemented.
Meta has made it clear that he will not sign up for the voluntary code. The company’s top lobbyist Joel Caplan said earlier this month that it was placing “an infeasible and technically impossible requirement” on Brussels audiences. He also warned that China could win AI races without a US partnership with Europe over AI.
The social media group led by Mark Zuckerberg felt abandoned by the previous Biden administration, opposed to EU regulations, according to several people familiar with the issue. But now the US administration supports that perspective and feels it can put more pressure on the bloc.
In September, the company began a public letter leading the way, co-signing by 50 other groups, including Sweden’s Ericsson and Spotify, claiming it would reduce innovation in European regulatory frameworks and delay the continent to AI development. Ta.
Meta also says it cannot ship multimodal leading language models and the EU’s latest AI assistants due to block privacy rules. Other US tech companies, such as Google, have also stepped up criticism of AI regulations.
Another important lobbying activity from Big Tech is the implementation of the Digital Markets Act. It is designed to tackle the so-called digital gatekeeper domination of the largest online platform.
Recommended
If they commit a crime of non-compliance, companies face massive fines that could reach up to 10% of global sales.
Apple, Meta and Google owner Alphabet are all targeting probes after the new rules came into effect in 2023. However, since Trump’s election victory in November, the Commission has reevaluated the investigation.
Trump directly attacked EU fines against American companies, calling it a “form of taxation” at the World Economic Forum held in Davos last month.
Silicon Valley Group is asking for a reopening of DMAs, or is issuing clarifications that will provide clearer guidance on how it will be applied, saying the senior US technology giants are said.
A weak enforcement would mean the EU will stop fines under regulations, adding that the “Trump effect” would be diplomacy if America’s biggest companies were given sanctions. He said it means there is a threat of fallout.
Most European leaders seem reluctant to stand up to the US with high-tech that could have broader and safer meaning, according to Giorgos Verdi, a policy fellow at the Council of Europe on diplomatic relations. It seems to be
He argued that this not only sets a bad precedent for the EU’s regulatory approach, but could “burn Trump and his technological allies, who view inaction as a sign of weakness.”
Dozens of tech companies and NGOs have already called on the EU to properly enforce digital rules, criticizing the big technology for “mobilizing the Trump administration” and “controlling potential competitors.” I’m doing it.
European Commission’s Virkkunen said lobbying would not change rules, reminding US companies that “the European Union is one of the biggest markets for major technologies.”
